I agree. They are definitely two different areas in the current implementation. I'll file a JIRA with the disk quota, with some initial observations about the current system. Note, anyone interested in working on it should the join the discussion, at the present I don't plan on implementing.
Rodrigo Madera wrote:
Good idea! On 5/5/06, Bryan Pendleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:It seems to me that there may be two different features being discussed here: 1) Allowing more than one segment for data storage. 2) Establishing a disk "quota" on a segment, so that Derby will limit its space usage to no more than its quota. It strikes me that it might be useful to implement these features independently, as each seems like it could be potentially useful without the other, and then both could be profitably used together. thanks, bryan
