Hm, reading this patch, it seems a little convoluted. If you still have
to set the jdk16 property, what's the value of setting JAVA_HOME to a
1.6 directory? What does it buy me? Perhaps we should explain, because
reading it as it is, I tend to ask "why would I want to do that?"
Thanks,
David
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 5/5/06, David Van Couvering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, something like
"If you are working with JDBC 4.0, you might want to set JAVA_HOME to
the JDK 1.6 install location. This is not required but is the preferred
way to do a build of Derby that includes classes that require the 1.6
compiler"
So here's a patch with similar wording. Touched up a couple of other
things I noticed while I was at it. Let me know what you think.
andrew
