Thanks, Andrew,
A couple more small points:
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 5/9/06, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is the following then a fair summary of your patch comment:
o I will remove my index.html from the patch
o At your leisure, you can create a more capable, top level index.html
and wrestle with the release machinery to get it into our release
distributions
Yes. (don't forget to add that if="jdk16")
It turns out the if="jdk16" clause is on the target itself. I have
verified that if I remove the jdk16 flag from ant.properties, then we
continue to build the same javadoc we did six months ago.
Hope I'm not talking at cross-purposes still.
Nope. Could you check your file in as index.html at the top level
though? I like what you had written for the javadoc. I'll add sections
for the docs and demos.
By top level, do you mean in the same directory that holds BUILDING.txt
and published_api_overview.html?
Thanks,
-Rick
