Sorry, recently modified as I am, I don't have the itch to fix this on
JDK 1.3... I support you removing it from that platform.
David
Satheesh Bandaram wrote:
I would like to see this failure go away one way or the other on JDK 1.3
runs. Looking at svn log, you seem to be the "recently modified person"
and the author of the test! Do you have itch to modify the test?
Otherwise, I will likely disable the test for JDK1.3. This platform is
getting little too old..
Satheesh
On 5/19/06, *David Van Couvering* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
What does it mean to be a "recently modified person?" :)
I was the one who wrote this (quite a while ago, actually), and you're
right, as it stands it won't run on JDK 1.3.
However, I think there is value in testing the getNextException()
methods on JDK 1.3. Can't we test for the JDK version in the test and
exclude the tests of getCause() if it's JDK 1.3?
David
Satheesh Bandaram wrote:
> Sounds like a good approach... Any interest from the writers or
recently
> modified persons to exclude this test on 1.3? If no one has this
itch, I
> probably will address this test issue.
>
> Satheesh
>
> On 5/19/06, *Rick Hillegas* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> Hi Satheesh,
>
> It looks to me like this is a new test introduced by revision
386710 to
> close DERBY-1117. Testing getCause() appears to be central to
what this
> test wants to verify. Maybe we shouldn't run this test on 1.3.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
> Satheesh Bandaram wrote:
>
> > Looks like this test was modified to use getCause()
method, which is
> > not supported in JDK 1.3 platforms. This causes the test
to fail.
> What
> > should be done to fix the failure on JDK 1.3 ?
> >
> > Satheesh
>
>
>
