Jean T. Anderson wrote: > David Van Couvering wrote: > >>OK, thanks, I thought this was a separate effort than the one already >>contributed. >> >>If we don't get the CLA, are we able to take what he's contributed and >>run with it? Or do we need to start from scratch? > > > There are 6 new files in the patch for DERBY-646, which makes a > significant contribution, in my opinion, so that iCLA would be needed.
oops -- never apply a patch quickly then do a quick 'svn status'. On the revert, I discovered I missed all the files in a new "memory" subdirectory. This is bigger than just the 6 files I looked at, so there's no doubt in my mind that this requires an iCLA. Of course, anyone who has actually looked at the code and built it should feel free to chime in. But I'll now stop adding noise to the list :-) -jean
