[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1341?page=comments#action_12414518 ] 

Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1341:
--------------------------------------

Lance Andersen adds:

>
>
>    [ 
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1341?page=comments#action_12414483 
> ] 
>
>Anurag Shekhar commented on DERBY-1341:
>---------------------------------------
>
>I was wrong about life time of lob. It is supposed to restricted only for the 
>transaction (jdbc 3.0 section 16.3.1)
>  
>
For locator based that would be true.  However if it is  a copy , it could well 
live past the transaction.  This has been clarified in the jdbc 4 spec

> LOB setBytes method(s) are currently no supported, but part of the Java 1.4 
> JDBC interface
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-1341
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1341
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: JDBC
>     Versions: 10.0.2.0, 10.0.2.1, 10.0.2.2, 10.1.1.0, 10.2.0.0, 10.1.2.0, 
> 10.1.1.1, 10.1.1.2, 10.1.2.1, 10.1.3.0, 10.1.2.2, 10.1.2.3, 10.3.0.0, 
> 10.1.2.4, 10.1.2.5
>  Environment: Windows 2000
>     Reporter: Keith McFarlane
>     Assignee: Anurag Shekhar

>
>  JDBC LOB . getBtypes methods are not implemented in any Derby version to 
> date: there is a "place-holder" method that throws a SQLException reporting 
> that the methods are not implemented.
> It would be excellent to have any efficient Derby implementation of the 
> getBytes LOB methods that provide "random-access" to the binary // character 
> content of database large objects. The specific context is implementing a 
> Lucene Directory interface that stores indexing data (index files) and other 
> binary data in a local encrypted Derby instance. 
>  A work around is to write an encrypted RandomAccessFile implementation as a 
> file-sdystem buffer, perhaps writing to the database on closure. An efficient 
> Derby implementation of LOB . getBytes would avoid this an make for a clean 
> design. I can think of several reasons why random-access to LOBs would be 
> valuable in a "hostile"  client environment. 
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to