On 6/2/06, John Embretsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The same test was run against the trunk not so long ago, and was able to run for at least 4 weeks without producing the same error (although memory usage graphs seem rather similar at first glance). I am assuming that this increased robustness (10.2 vs. 10.1) has something to do with the fact that DERBY-210 patches are in trunk, but not in the 10.1 branch, as far as I know.
The patches were recently ported to10.1 branch (on 05/22/06) as part of DERBY-1103. Thanks, Deepa
