Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Mayuresh Nirhali wrote:
One thing to consider is merging the fix really going to benefit 10.1.
In this case I would say it's not worth the extra effort of determing
which other patches are needed or manually resolving changes. The fix
basically changes an error message, not an essential chanage for 10.1,
though it is a good change for 10.2.
If loooking for a high value port to 10.1 DERBY-1329 might be a good
option. Satheesh just put that fix in the trunk.
Other porting candidates are listed at:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/HighValueFixCandidates#head-d9978e63ee3ad083975b8d470968fdccf9f9e813
Kathey
