[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1376?page=comments#action_12415060 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1376:
--------------------------------------------
I like Halley's recommendation, but I would suggest that providing the format
Halley suggests may be difficult given our current message framework (that is,
provide a message with multiple lines). It might be sufficient to say
Log directory {0} exists. The directory may belong to another database.
Please make sure the specified logDevice location is correct.
(I do like to say "please", it doesn't hurt to be polite to our users).
Also, it would be helpful to say *where* you specify logDevice (e.g. "please
make sure the derby.foo.logDevice property is set to the correct location.")
David
> File java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_en.properties - Message XSLAT.D
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1376
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1376
> Project: Derby
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Localization
> Versions: 10.1.2.4
> Environment: Text for exceptions
> Reporter: Halley Pacheco de Oliveira
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 10.1.2.4
>
> The message XSLAT.D (String LOG_SEGMENT_EXIST = "XSLAT.D";) states:
> XSLAT.D=Log directory {0} exists. Please make sure specified logDevice
> location is correct.
> But it seems by the source code that the problem is not that this directory
> exists, but the fact that it is not empty (// make sure log directory is
> empty, in LogToFile.java). So it seems to me that the following message would
> be better:
> XSLAT.D=Log directory {0} is not empty. Please make sure specified logDevice
> location is correct.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
