David Van Couvering wrote: > Good news Lance, thanks, I was getting worried if we were going to have > to regularly change column order and break existing applications/IDEs/etc.
Hopefully we don't have any documented Derby specific additional columns in the metadata, that would be non-standard. Dan. > > David > > Lance J. Andersen wrote: > >> hi guys >> >> Rick Hillegas wrote: >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> I had a couple more comments on the compatibility commitments. >>> Cheers-Rick >>> >>> - Changes to stored procedures: We will have to change column order if >>> we add Derby-specific columns to a metadata ResultSet and then a later >>> JDBC also adds more columns. >> >> Any vendor specific columns added should only be accessed via column >> name and you should document that. >> >> we did clarify this in the JDBC spec > >
