Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > Nice post. Comments inline : > > Andrew McIntyre wrote: ... >>So, I can see any of the following things as possibilities: >> >>1) The Derby community could release a 10.2.1.x minus the JDBC 4 bits >>whenever it likes. Maybe even next week. :-) >>2) Sun releases a version of Derby with JDK 1.6 that reports as >>10.2.1.x and has upgrade enabled, however they want to do that. >>Hopefully they get this right and it upgrades to the official 10.2. > > > What does it mean "upgrade enabled"?
I didn't spot that anybody answered this question. The derby development code line has an alpha version tag that disables upgrade in Derby. If a user creates a "production" database using software built from the development code line, then installs the official Derby release, the official Derby release can't access that database, can't upgrade it to the official release. -jean
