[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-894?page=comments#action_12419571 ] 

Sunitha Kambhampati commented on DERBY-894:
-------------------------------------------

Just wanted to mention: 
 I ran recently the checkDataSource tests with 10.1 derbyTesting.jar and 10.2  
server as part of DERBY-1449 and the tests passed OK.  
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1449?page=comments#action_12418530

Is anyone seeing the diff mentioned in this jira ?   If not, should we close 
this issue ?

> checkDataSource test fails with a 10.1 derbytesting.jar and a 10.2 engine.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-894
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-894
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Test
>     Versions: 10.1.1.0, 10.1.1.1, 10.1.1.2, 10.1.2.0, 10.1.2.1, 10.1.2.2
>  Environment:  10.2.0.0 alpha - 372715 (except derbyTesting.jar) and 10.1 
> derbyTesting.jar file
> OS: Windows 2000, JVM: sun jdk 142
>     Reporter: David Van Couvering
>     Priority: Minor

>
> The test fails because the test complains that two connections from same 
> pooled connection have separate unique ids.  But actually the only difference 
> is the id of the wrapping BrokeredConnection, the underlying EmbedConnection 
> is the same.  I'm not sure why this only occurs with a 10.1 testing jar and a 
> 10.2 client, but perhaps we changed the way we do pooled connections to 
> allocate a separate BrokeredConnection object within the lifetime of a pooled 
> connection.
> Anyway, the functionality is fine, and the test should be fixed in the 10.1 
> codeline.  I searched for the string "Two connections from the same pooled 
> connection" in the trunk and couldn't find it, so I think this is old test 
> code that has since been removed.  Once I figure out how to get access to the 
> 10.1 codeline I'll try to find the original code and add a suggestiong as to 
> how to fix it.
> Here is the test output:
> > java.lang.Exception: Two connections from the same pooled connection have 
> > diff
> erent string values: [EMAIL PROTECTED], W
> rapped Connection = [EMAIL PROTECTED] (XID =
>  164), (SESSIONID = 33), (DATABASE = wombat), (DRDAID = null) , 
> org.apache.derby
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wrapped Connection = org.apache.derby.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (XID = 164), (SESSIONID = 33), (DATABASE =
> wombat), (DRDAID = null)
> > java.lang.Exception: Two connections from the same pooled connection have 
> > diff
> erent string values: [EMAIL PROTECTED], W
> rapped Connection = [EMAIL PROTECTED] (XID =
>  164), (SESSIONID = 33), (DATABASE = wombat), (DRDAID = null) , 
> org.apache.derby
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wrapped Connection = org.apache.derby.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (XID = 164), (SESSIONID = 33), (DATABASE =
> wombat), (DRDAID = null)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to