Kathey Marsden wrote:
I want to clarify what I meant here. I should have just said: This competition, in addition to finding regressions, will also incorporate fixing regressions. The winners will be: "The top three developers or users who have made the greatest contribution toward a seamless upgrade to 10.2." I did not mean to imply that in order to win the contest you have to fix the regressions you find, just that both regression Search (finding regressions) and Destroy (fixing regressions) would be considered by the judge(s). Actually any activity that contributes to seamless upgrade including documenting known compatibility issues is a valid contribution for consideration in the contest. Kathey |
- Derby Regression Search And Destroy Competition Kathey Marsden
- Re: Derby Regression Search And Destroy Competition Kathey Marsden
- Re: Derby Regression Search And Destroy Competition Stanley Bradbury
- Re: Derby Regression Search And Destroy Competit... Kathey Marsden
