[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-974?page=comments#action_12419927 ] 

Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-974:
--------------------------------------

Hello Michael if you you are still monitoring this issue. I wanted to follow up 
 and see if  if you were still interested in pursuing posting a patch to  
issue.  It seems like it would be very useful for Network Client not to lose 
properties.    I hope that Deepa's  comment answered your questions about 
creating a patch and tests.

I looked briefly at  ProperiesTest.java and see that  it does show  how using 
keys()  would be a problem. I think though that it would be good as Deepa said 
to have a reproducible case/test to show the functional  impact with  Derby.

I will be happy to try out and review your patch/repro  if/when you  submit it. 
   Please let us know if you are still interested in working on this issue.  


> ClientDriver can lose some connection properties
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-974
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-974
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Network Client
>     Versions: 10.1.2.1, 10.1.2.2
>  Environment: Linux, Sun JRE 1.5
>     Reporter: Michael Hackett
>     Priority: Minor
>  Attachments: ClientDriver.java-diff, PropertiesTest.java
>
> Internally, the ClientDriver class's appendDatabaseAttributes() method uses 
> keys() on the connection properties to get a list of the property names. 
> However, this misses any properties in the default set. The correct method 
> for a Properties object is propertyNames(). This will return the same type of 
> object as keys(), but will include all properties.
> (It is unfortunate that Sun chose to make Properties a subclass of Hashtable, 
> instead of giving Properties a Hashtable, as the former exposes too much 
> implementation.)
> The fix is to simply replace calls to keys() on all Property objects to use 
> propertyNames(). A quick search revealed that this is not the only place in 
> the code base where this is done, so a more thorough scan should be made.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to