[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1535?page=all ]

Tomohito Nakayama updated DERBY-1535:
-------------------------------------

    Attachment: DERBY-1535.patch
                serverMemoryUsage.xls

Reading the code of NetworkServer, it was found that PreparedStatement.setBytes 
was used.

Here, I hypothesize that PreparedStatement.setBytes needs more memory than 
PreparedStatement.setBinaryInputStream.
Based on that hypothesis, I change call of PreparedStatement.setBytes to 
PreparedStatement.setBinaryInputStream.

Measured result was not different from referential result in DERBY-1504.

However, with this patch, OutOfMemoryError was not thrown from NetworkServer in 
the configuration of -Xmx256m.
Without this patch, OutOfMemoryError was found in the same configuration of 
-Xmx256m as written in 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1513#action_12421379. 
// However again,  OutOfMemoryError happened at the client side....
// But it is not at server side.





> Trial2 for DERBY-550, improve use of Engine from NetworkServer and reduce 
> memory usage
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1535
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1535
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Tomohito Nakayama
>         Attachments: DERBY-1535.patch, serverMemoryUsage.xls
>
>
> Through DERBY-1513, Trial 1 for DERBY-550, 
> it was suggested that NetworkServer seems to use Engine inefficiently and use 
> too much of memory.
> This task try to improve the use of Engine from NetworkServer and try to 
> reduce memory usage.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to