Yes, it's easy for data like this to slip through with the volume of email on this list. I'm not sure how to resolve that, there's just going to be some amount of lossiness in the system...

David

Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
On 8/1/06, David Van Couvering (JIRA) <derby-dev@db.apache.org> wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1616?page=comments#action_12424956 ]

David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1616:
--------------------------------------------

Finally tracked down the source of this problem. I was very confused because the output files were showing "SQL Exception" while the code definitely sh owed it should be saying "java.sql.SQLException".
[snip]

Someone was going to get around to telling me that, right? :)

Actually, I did send a message wondering about this, but it was a
reply to one of the failure reports, you must've missed it.
http://www.nabble.com/Regression-Test-Failure%21---Derby-426908---Sun-DBTG-tf2026368.html#a5572398

:-)

Re-running derbyall, thanks for your patience.

> Lots of jdk1.6 regression test failures with diffs because of SQL Exception instead of java.sql.SQLException

Reply via email to