Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:

We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development. A number of Blocker and Urgent issues are still in motion. Now would be a good time to alert the community if you are working on one of these issues and think that you might need some help to finish by August 10.

DERBY-688   Enhancements to XML functionality to move toward
XPath/XQuery support...
           http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-688


There are currently 5 (yes, five) incremental patches attached to DERBY-688, each of which is dependent on its predecessor and none of which have been reviewed/committed yet. I also have one or two _additional_ (small) patches to post in order to align the XML datatype with the targeted subset of SQL/XML[2006] functionality.

I've already given up on completing any of the JDBC-side changes described for DERBY-688 by the August 10th deadline (yes, I need to update the spec to reflect that); instead I'm just working on SQL-side support only (and even that is just a subset of what I originally proposed). That said, I've been side-tracked with the blocker regression DERBY-1633 and am therefore quickly running out of time to finish the final XML changes.

While I still hope to have the remaining patches posted by the 10th, if anyone has time to review/commit the patches that I've already posted, I would be extremely grateful. It's hard enough that I'm side-tracked with DERBY-1633; it would be nice if, when I finally get back to XML, I could just spend time on the remaining changes instead of having to re-sync all five patches with the latest codeline (and with each other) and then create the final patches w.r.t to those other uncommitted patches. Ugh. This kind of multi-patch-sync is time-consuming, error-prone, and just generally not fun (one of the downsides to incremental development, I guess...?).

If there's anyone out there with the time and inclination to move the XML patches forward (by reviewing and/or commmitting), I could certainly use the help.

Many thanks,
Army

Reply via email to