[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425895 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377: ----------------------------------------------
I would say no to the generated javadoc, they are not source files. Though maybe the copyright statement in the footer should be modified to be just copyright ASF, matching the first copyright in the NOTICE file. Ie. the collected works copyright. The overview to the javadoc does contain a licence statement. > Update copyright headers to comply with new ASF policy > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: DERBY-1377 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Documentation > Affects Versions: 10.2.0.0 > Reporter: Jean T. Anderson > Assigned To: David Van Couvering > Fix For: 10.2.0.0 > > Attachments: DERBY-1377_NOTICE_diff.txt > > > A new copyright header policy will take effect for distributions released > starting on Sep 1, 2006. Committers will receive notification, but a heads up > with details is in the legal-discuss thread starting with > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200606.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] > Date was 1-Aug-2006, is now 1-Sep-2006: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200607.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
