I guess it's not a regression or bug, so not a release note, but I didn't know how else to indicate that documentation was needed, given that it's a new feature...

David

Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
David Van Couvering wrote:

I see your point about new classes added to the public API needing
javadoc, that seems reasonable.

By release, do you mean a Derby release.

I missed an 'e'. You checked the 'Release Note Needed' flag, why would a
release note be needed?

Dan.


Reply via email to