[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-567?page=all ]

A B closed DERBY-567.
---------------------


> Improve Derby XML support to use XML parser found in JVM instead of using a 
> hard-coded parser name (Xerces).
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-567
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-567
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.0.0
>            Reporter: A B
>         Assigned To: A B
>             Fix For: 10.2.0.0
>
>
> Background:
> - Sun 1.4 jvms bundle the Crimson XML parser, but do not have Xerces.
> - IBM jvms bundle the Xerces XML parser, but do not have Crimson. 
> - As of J2SE 1.5, Sun JVMs bundle Xerces instead of Crimson (according to 
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/compatibility.html, #10 (JAXP))
> - I don't know anything about what other JVMs use for XML parsing...
> Issue:
> As of DERBY-334 Derby has a very basic level of support for an XML datatype 
> that uses the Apache Xerces 2 parser.  The parser name is hard-coded into 
> Derby and thus anyone wishing to use Derby XML must include Xerces in his/her 
> classpath.
> Up to now, the basic XML functionality used by Derby is available in both the 
> Crimson and the Xerces parsers.  Thus, it'd be nice if we could improve Derby 
> to support both of these parsers (and perhaps others) dynamically, thereby 
> allowing XML to work regardless of whether the JVM is Sun or IBM or something 
> else (assuming the JVM is 1.4 or later).
> For example, it'd be useful if we could perhaps have Derby choose a parser 
> based on the JVM in use and/or a user-specified database property.  Making 
> this change would allow people to use XML in Derby within environments of 
> their own choosing, instead of forcing them to download a specific parser 
> that they don't otherwise want/need.  Someone using a Sun 1.4 JVM could use 
> XML in Derby without having to download Xerces; someone using an IBM JVM 
> could use XML in Derby without having to download Crimson; and someone using 
> a Sun 1.4 JVM could, if desired, download Xerces and then use that parser 
> with the Sun 1.4 JVM; etc.  Basically, we'd just be increasing the 
> flexibility of Derby XML and thus making it more valuable to users.
> I haven't yet looked in detail at _how_ to best make this improvement, but I 
> do think it's worth filing for (near-)future development...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to