I agree, we need to watch for this now.  Everybody fix your templates!

It's good to know, also, that the scripts can be used to catch files that slip through the cracks (e.g. with no license headers or with old/incorrect ones). I would humbly recommend that the release manager run these scripts and see what they turn up as part of the release checklist. With further refinement they could probably be added as part our regression test; since they're Perl-based and require a UNIX platform, I don't think they can be part of derbyall.

David

Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
David Van Couvering wrote:

Thanks to everyone for all your work on this.  We are *done* with the
exception of SQL scripts (which are being deferred until after 10.2),
and we are still pending on the documentation and web site changes.

I was impressed with the amount of participation and the speed with
which things were done.  Great work everyone!

Congratulations all.

This means that we need to watch out for incoming new files to ensure
they do not contain any copyright statement. Or I guess any copyrights
are added to existing files.

Dan.

Reply via email to