[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1582?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-1582:
--------------------------------
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Thanks Dan for looking at the patch.
>From what I had tried, I had found that we have to keep track if any privilege
>is revoked in TablePrivilegeInfo itself as addRemovePermissionsDescriptor is
>called multiple times in TablePrivilegeInfo.executeGrantRevoke method. Because
>of this, we need to track whether or not any privilege is revoked for table
>and routine separately. And we cannot move the whole check to super class.
I think I should have added a common method to check and raise a warning if
needed. I'll upload a revised patch.
Please let me know if this doesn't sound okay.
> REVOKE statement does not generate a warning when no privileges are revoked.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1582
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1582
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 10.2.0.0
> Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
> Assigned To: Deepa Remesh
> Attachments: d1582_v1.diff, d1582_v1.status
>
>
> SQL 2003 standard, section 12.7 <revoke statement>, item 17 under general
> rules indicates the statement completes with the condition 'warning ?
> privilege not revoked.' when no matching privilege is revoked.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
