[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-928?page=all ]
Sunitha Kambhampati updated DERBY-928:
--------------------------------------
Derby Info: [Release Note Needed]
Adding the release note needed flag. Information is in wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/SecurityMechanism I'll try to post the info
in release note format.
> Add ability to network server to accept connections with a certain security
> mechanism.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-928
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-928
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Network Server
> Reporter: Sunitha Kambhampati
> Assigned To: Sunitha Kambhampati
> Fix For: 10.2.0.0
>
> Attachments: Derby928.3.diff.txt, Derby928.3.stat.txt,
> Derby928.diff.txt, Derby928.stat.txt, Derby928_canons.diff.txt,
> Derby928_canons.stat.txt, Derby928_Table_SecurityMechanisms..htm,
> Derby928_v2_diff.txt, Derby928_v2_stat.txt
>
>
> Currently the network server has support for the following security mechanisms
> 1) USRIDONL (userid only),
> 2) USRIDPWD (clear text userid and password),
> 3) EUSRIDPWD (encrypted userid and password).
> Thus the #3 encrypted userid and password security mechanism is secure with
> respect to the userid/password sent across the wire. Currently there is no
> way to setup the network server to ensure that it accepts connections coming
> in at a certain security mechanism. It seems reasonable & useful to have a
> server want to accept connections from clients with a particular security
> mechanism (e.g lets say encrypted userid/password and reject usridpwd ie
> clear text userid and password)
> This jira will add support for this by adding a property to enable the server
> to be able to accept connections from clients with a certain security
> mechanism.
> --------------------
> I actually couldnt find if a rank was given to the security mechanisms in the
> drda spec. If it were so, then maybe a property for setting the minimum
> security mechanism accepted by the server would be appropriate.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
