Well, this will spoil my little plan to just mega-merge from the trunk
to the 10.2 branch. If we do this, then we'll need to start swimming
with lead weights on now. Every patch from 430830 onward should be
hand-merged into the 10.2 branch.
Regards,
-Rick
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: rhillegas
Date: Fri Aug 11 10:19:07 2006
New Revision: 430830
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=430830&view=rev
Log: (empty)
Added:
db/derby/code/branches/10.2/
- copied from r430829, db/derby/code/trunk/
I see you've gone for creating the branch for your beta. Could you
please take a moment and also mark the trunk as version 10.3? It would
be nice to not have the branch and the trunk reporting as the same
version.
Thanks,
andrew