Rick Hillegas wrote: > Hi Kathey, > > Thanks for bringing up this issue. I appreciate all of your help as I > plod through this. Right now we just have a distribution with "beta" in > its release id. I think that this distribution exceeds the low bar set > by that web page: "This [beta designation] indicates that it is expected > to compile and perform basic tasks. However, there may be problems with > this release that prohibit its widespread adoption." However, to > technically qualify as an Apache beta, we need to schedule a vote. I > will do that.
Is the "beta" the same as the "release candidate" mentioned in your initial planning posts? Or do you see a strong beta moving to release candidate? -jean > > Regards, > -Rick > > Kathey Marsden wrote: > >> Rick Hillegas wrote: >> >>> Please test-drive the 10.2.1.0 beta candidate, available at >>> http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.2.1.0-beta/. >> >> >> >> I have a probably very foolish question. By beta "candidate" does >> that mean that this is something we vote on to reach beta status ala >> the the HTTP Server project: >> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html, or does it actually have >> beta status already? It would be neat to have the official beta >> available for download from the website to increase exposure. >> >> Kathey. >> >
