[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1643?page=all ]

Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-1643:
-----------------------------------------

    Derby Info:   (was: [Patch Available])

 DERBY1643_diff_V2_RevokeExecutePrivilege.txt patch was applied on 8/9 - thanks 
Mamta

> A  "revoke execute ... restrict" should fail if there are dependent objects 
> on the execute privilege
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1643
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1643
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.0
>            Reporter: Mamta A. Satoor
>         Assigned To: Mamta A. Satoor
>         Attachments: DERBY1643_diff_V1_RevokeExecutePrivilege.txt, 
> DERBY1643_diff_V2_RevokeExecutePrivilege.txt, 
> DERBY1643_stat_V1_RevokeExecutePrivilege.txt, 
> DERBY1643_stat_V2_RevokeExecutePrivilege.txt
>
>
> As per the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330, a "revoke execute ... 
> restrict" should fail if there are dependent objects on the execute privilege
> In order to implement this, when revoke execute is executed, a special 
> invalidation action should be sent and dependent objects will need to catch 
> that invalidation and throw an exception. If there are no dependents, then no 
> exception will be thrown and revoke execute will succeed.
> I am just creating a new jira entry here so it is easier to track sub items 
> of DERBY-1330. Will link this Jira entry to DERBY-1330. 
> See the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to