Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > Jean T. Anderson wrote: >>Bryan Pendleton wrote: >> >>>I propose to commit DERBY-119 to the trunk within the next week. >>> >>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-119 >>> >>>This is a new feature, and should not be merged to 10.2, but my >>>understanding is that all the mass-merging from the trunk to 10.2 >>>is complete and it is ok to start putting new work into the trunk. >> >>for the docs, Rick had just suggested adding any exclusions to the end >>of http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenTwoRelease : >> >>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL >>PROTECTED] >> >>(In fact the docs are easy because everything being committed to the >>trunk right now is a mega merge candidate.) >> >>At any rate, I *think* all you need to do is list your addition to that >>Wiki page. > > I thought the mega-merges had been completed? Rick said it was up to > individuals to merge items.
yep, you're right! I found Rick's post [1] which says: > From this point onward, the trunk is open to feature work which will > not go into 10.2. In addition, from now on, all 10.2 patches need to be > committed to both the trunk and the 10.2 branch. -jean [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
