On 8/24/06, Rick Hillegas (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1746?page=comments#action_12430281 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1746:
--------------------------------------
I'm afraid I'm a bit confused about what to do with these patches:
---------------- Trunk Patch -----------------------------
After I apply this patch to the trunk, I see the following diffs in the
10_1_10_2 test:
702a703
>
,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx,7
707 del
< complete caseVersionCheck - passed true
707a708
> complete caseVersionCheck - passed false
1462 del
< END - PASS - phase SOFT UPGRADE
1462a1463
> END - FAIL - phase SOFT UPGRADE
2166a2168
>
,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx,7
2171 del
< complete caseVersionCheck - passed true
2171a2173
> complete caseVersionCheck - passed false
2953 del
< END - PASS - phase UPGRADE
2953a2955
> END - FAIL - phase UPGRADE
Test Failed.
*** End: Upgrade_10_1_10_2 jdk1.4.2_08 2006-08-24 09:12:23 ***
I think that the lines beginning with ",APP,DERBY655T2," are new diffs added by
this patch. It seems that this patch is making the results dirtier rather than cleaner.
In addition, I don't think we should be running a test called 10_1_10_2 in the
trunk. We should be running some other tests, perhaps 10_1_to_Current and
10_2_to_Current in the trunk. Perhaps 10_1_10_2 becomes the basis for
10_1_to_Current.
I'm wondering if you missed the tail end of my comment when attaching the file:
"I assume patch or eclipse-apply-patch won't deal with the changing of
properties, so here is the svn command:
(when cd-ed to the top of the branch)
cd tools/testing
svn propedit svn:externals derby
& change to:
derby/10.1 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/derby/jars/10.1.3.1
(note: svn update required after to see the files changed) "
The whole point of this patch is to run with 10.1.3.1 jars...Were you
doing that?
Thx,
Myrna
