[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12430545 ] 
            
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-1330:
-------------------------------

Mamta, thanks for those jira links.  My actual concern is the working of the 
permission cache.  From what I interpret from those discussion, it seems that 
getXXXPermissions(UUID) are currently never called from the code line; thus, 
they are never exercised.   Dan's patch addressed the issue of avoiding to 
reconstruct the "provider" from the stored dependencies; however, my example 
above is actually of the "dependent".  There are cases where we need to 
exercise getXXXPermissions(UUID) to make use of the stored dependencies.  For 
example, when granting a view that has underlying objects that is not own by 
the grantor, we need to go through all the view's providers to see if they are 
own by the grantor  ( + grant option check, but since Derby does not support 
this yet, I'll skip the details).  So, the getXXXPermission(UUID) needs to be 
called and currently the equals and hashCode methods of the various 
PermissionDescriptor types do need to address the nullibility of grantee and 
tableUUID or other related field that is used for the hashing.  Even though the 
nullibility are addressed... back to my original question:

How does the PermissionsCache work with respect to passing two type of keys to 
represent the same PermissionDescriptor? If an object can be represented by two 
type of keys, how does it take advantage of the cache? Once one key's identity 
is set, its hash code should remain the same while it is stored in the cache, 
wouldn't the "other" key always miss then?


> Provide runtime privilege checking for grant/revoke functionality
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1330
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.0
>            Reporter: Mamta A. Satoor
>         Assigned To: Mamta A. Satoor
>             Fix For: 10.2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: AuthorizationModelForDerbySQLStandardAuthorization.html, 
> AuthorizationModelForDerbySQLStandardAuthorizationV2.html, 
> DERBY1330javaDocWarningsDiffV9.txt, DERBY1330javaDocWarningsStatV9.txt, 
> Derby1330MinorCleanupV7diff.txt, Derby1330MinorCleanupV7stat.txt, 
> Derby1330PrivilegeCollectionV2diff.txt, 
> Derby1330PrivilegeCollectionV2stat.txt, 
> Derby1330PrivilegeCollectionV3diff.txt, 
> Derby1330PrivilegeCollectionV3stat.txt, 
> Derby1330setUUIDinDataDictionaryV10diff.txt, 
> Derby1330setUUIDinDataDictionaryV10stat.txt, 
> Derby1330setUUIDinDataDictionaryV8diff.txt, 
> Derby1330setUUIDinDataDictionaryV8stat.txt, 
> Derby1330uuidIndexForPermsSystemTablesV4diff.txt, 
> Derby1330uuidIndexForPermsSystemTablesV4stat.txt, 
> Derby1330uuidIndexForPermsSystemTablesV5diff.txt, 
> Derby1330uuidIndexForPermsSystemTablesV5stat.txt, 
> Derby1330uuidIndexForPermsSystemTablesV6diff.txt, 
> Derby1330uuidIndexForPermsSystemTablesV6stat.txt, 
> Derby1330ViewPrivilegeCollectionV1diff.txt, 
> Derby1330ViewPrivilegeCollectionV1stat.txt
>
>
> Additional work needs to be done for grant/revoke to make sure that only 
> users with required privileges can access various database objects. In order 
> to do that, first we need to collect the privilege requirements for various 
> database objects and store them in SYS.SYSREQUIREDPERM. Once we have this 
> information then when a user tries to access an object, the required 
> SYS.SYSREQUIREDPERM privileges for the object will be checked against the 
> user privileges in SYS.SYSTABLEPERMS, SYS.SYSCOLPERMS and 
> SYS.SYSROUTINEPERMS. The database object access will succeed only if the user 
> has the necessary privileges.
> SYS.SYSTABLEPERMS, SYS.SYSCOLPERMS and SYS.SYSROUTINEPERMS are already 
> populated by Satheesh's work on DERBY-464. But SYS.SYSREQUIREDPERM doesn't 
> have any information in it at this point and hence no runtime privilege 
> checking is getting done at this point.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Reply via email to