[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1746?page=comments#action_12431034 ] 
            
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-1746:
-------------------------------------------

I experimented and found the following:
- the problem appears to be with 10.1.3.1 derby.jar. Using the other 10.1.3.1 
jars don't cause the same trouble.
- comparing the 10.1.1.0 derby.jar and 10.1.3.1 derby.jar it seemed the main 
difference was that the 10.1.3.1. does not have the directories in the jar.
- When I unjarred 10.1.3.1 derby.jar with jar -tvf, and then jar-ed back up 
using jar -xvf *, the resulting derby.jar could be used & the test did not give 
the sealing error.

This is very strange, does this mean the 10.1.3.1 jars are bad? 
 I welcome any suggestions on how to proceed.


> upgrade tests should start using 10.1.3 released builds
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1746
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1746
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Test
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.0
>            Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren
>         Assigned To: Myrna van Lunteren
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: DERBY-1746_102_20060823.diff, 
> DERBY-1746_102_20060823.stat, DERBY-1746_trunk_20060824.diff
>
>
> The upgrade test' master is based on the 10.1 jars checked in to svn -  
> 10.1.1.0 - (208786). 
> However, we now have a newer released version of 10.1 - 10.1.3.  This would 
> be the obvious choice for someone running tests testing the beta jars.
> If the jars are 10.1.3 then a diff will occur because of the fix for 
> DERBY-655:
> 703d702
> < 
> ,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx,
>  7
> 2168d2166
> < 
> ,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx,
>  7
> It would be nice if the final build for 10.2 would include an updgrade test 
> master created using 10.1.3, And same is true for the trunk.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to