On 9/1/06, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
> On 9/1/06, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
[snip]
> Now that we know of the problem, I have to say I prefer the jumble
> approach, especially when the need arises to run on a number of
> different machines.
Why? Just trying to understand why you prefer it, you say you do but
provide no reason why. :-) Kind of like a veto with no reason!
Apologies, I didn't imply to veto anything. I like the jumble of
course because of habit, but I find it convenient and logical when
having to run derbyall on a number of rarely used machines, to have
all derby*.jar of a specific version and jars in one dir, one level
deep, with a nice breezy dir name like '102b1'. Also when using
scripts and copying jars around it's just easy to use the derby*.jar.
It's really no big deal though.
[snip]
