On 9/1/06, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The new database owner section in the GRANT/REVOKE functional spec attached to DERBY-464 has this text: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12338762/grantRevokeSpec_v5.html "Database owners assume the authorizationId of other users while operating in their user schemas. Objects created by database owners in other user schemas would be owned by that user." The first sentence is not what Derby is doing today: ij> set schema wilma; 0 rows inserted/updated/deleted ij> values current_user; 1 -------------------------------- DBO 1 row selected I think the code has the correct behaviour, I think was intended was trying to explain the next sentence about the objects not being owned by the DBA. I don't think the first sentence is needed, the second stands by itself. Dan.
I am not sure that I understand what you want changed... do you want the first sentence removed because the second sentence stands on it's own? Please open a JIRA issue for this change and log it in the DocReviews http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenTwoDocReview -- Laura Stewart
