Access rule violations should use a SQL state starting with '42' according to 
the SQL standard.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: DERBY-1828
                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1828
             Project: Derby
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: JDBC
    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.0, 10.3.0.0
            Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner


The SQL standard says that SQL State '42' is for "syntax error or access
rule violation" (section 23.1).

There is a question of what JDBC 4.0 exception should be thrown for a access 
rule violation,
JDBC 4.0 maps '42' to SQLSyntaxErrorException which seems wrong for an access 
rule.

Message thread:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to