On 9/8/06, Andrew McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/8/06, Laura Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have no clue as to what would be appropriate variable substitutes > for this message. Typically when I don't know, I put <value>, which > is vague/generic. > However, the context of this message makes we wonder if something more > specific can be used here. For is example is this message talking > about the number of parameters passed? If Yes, then I can use > <number> instead of <value>. > > The current message text is: > > XJ080 "USING execute statement passed {0} parameters rather than {1}."Correct. Both of these would be numbers of parameters, however USING clauses for joins were removed before Derby was made opensource and this message is no longer used. It should probably be removed, unless someone is planning on reimplementing USING.
D'oh. This wasn't referring to USING clauses for joins but for EXECUTE for prepared statements (also removed from Derby before being open sourced). andrew
