<Monologue>
>2)
>Technically possible.
>However I think define them as constants will make the code harder to
read ...
>Well ... avoid allocating a new memory would be much more important
for the program ....
I wish static variable in a method of Java as
static variable in a function of C .... :P
</Monologue>
Tomohito Nakayama (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12434120 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
------------------------------------------
Hello.
1)
The jdbcapi/parameterMapping.java takes both of XCL12 and 22005 as expected Exception...
Well .. anyway, I wiill test and report it.
However, I'm not sure whether 22005 is reasonable Exception .....
2)
Technically possible.
However I think define them as constants will make the code harder to read ...
Well ... avoid allocating a new memory would be much more important for the
program ....
3)
I sorted the element by hand and the result was hard-coded.
DEBUG code in checkType method proof that they are in correct order.
Resolve difference of type compatibility between Embedded and
NetworkServer/NetworkDriver
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: DERBY-1610
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Network Server, Network Client
Reporter: Tomohito Nakayama
Assigned To: Tomohito Nakayama
Attachments: DERBY-1610.diff, DERBY-1610_2.diff, DERBY-1610_3.diff,
parameterMapping.diff, parameterMapping.diff,
parameterMapping.diff.betweenEmbedded_and_NetworkServerNetworkClient,
parameterMapping_3.diff, TestNullChar.java
There exists difference of type compatibility between Embedded and
NetworkServer/NetworkClient.
This issue tries to resolve it.
--
/*
Tomohito Nakayama
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Naka
http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
*/
