Rick Hillegas wrote: > Jean T. Anderson wrote: >> Myrna van Lunteren wrote: ... >>> Nice team-writing, I have 1 more suggestion, how about mentioning >>> 10.2.1 instead of 10.2? > > Small nit: I believe that there's a dita variable for the release > identifier. I recommend using that variable. That way, we won't have to > airbrush this text if we build a 10.2.2.2 bugfix distribution which > still doesn't expose JDBC4.
Thanks, Rick, I'll look for that dita variable. Also, when I produce a "final" :-) doc patch, we can hold back from applying it in case Geir's plan succeeds [1]. -jean [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Thanks, > -Rick > >> >> great suggestion, Myrna, >> >> thanks, >> >> -jean
