[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1860?page=comments#action_12435885 ] 
            
A B commented on DERBY-1860:
----------------------------

I did a quick read of the html file attached this issue and I noticed two 
things:

1. DERBY-781 is not listed anywhere on the page.  Was than an intentional 
exclusion, and if so, can I ask why?  The reason I think it's important is 
because it has an associated release note that talks about how users who 
upgrade to 10.2 might see a change in behavior--namely, potential increase in 
compilation time for queries that do joins with subqueries.  The fix-in version 
is set to 10.2.1.0...is that not the correct version?

  Note: This is marked as an "Improvement" instead of a "bug" or "new 
feature"--could that by chance have anything to do with why it's not included?

2. The release note provided for DERBY-688 is not included.  Was that 
intentional?  If the release note as a whole is not worthy of being mentioned, 
at the very least we need to include the part about which version of Xalan has 
been used for testing of XML.  The documentation says that the user can find 
out what Xalan version is supported by looking at the release notes, so I think 
it needs to be mentioned somewhere.  In case your wondering, I'm thinking 
something along the lines of what Xalan does on their release page w.r.t the 
Xerces dependency:

  http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/faq.html#faq-N10095
  http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/#current


> Create release notes for 10.2
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1860
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1860
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>             Fix For: 10.2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: derby-1860-v01.diff, derby-1860-v02.diff, 
> RELEASE-NOTES.html
>
>
> Create release notes to be bundled with the release.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to