Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 9/24/06, Knut Anders Hatlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1846:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> The jdbc4 classes depend on junit, which we are not able to ship.
The source distribution contains junit.jar. Is that a problem?
Excellent question. The policy for Apache projects as of this moment
is contained here:
http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
JUnit is CPL 1.0, so must be included in binary form only, and
*appropriately labeled*:
http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html#labeling-reciprocity
Since the NOTICE file for 10.1.2.5 does not point to the relevant
source distribution of JUnit that is included, there is a problem with
our -src distribution. Either junit.jar must be excluded from the -src
distribution, or the appropriate notice must be included in NOTICE.
Thanks, Knut, for pointing out this problem.
andrew
Hey Andrew,
I have checked in a fix (DERBY-1886) which removes junit.jar from the
source distributions. I'd rather not spin a new release candidate.
Instead, I was hoping that the following would be adequate:
1) Hand-remove junit.jar from the source distributions for 10.2.1.5.
2) Re-sign those distributions.
Does this sound adequate?
Thanks,
-Rick
