TomohitoNakayama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello. > > Thank you for your comment :) > I think you understood what the issue is. > > I understand your idea as using module of Engine where JDBC4.0 feature > is implemented > directly rather than via JDBC interface from NetworkServer. > > I take the idea in consideration.
The network server already does this for some JDBC 3.0 methods that it needs even when the JVM only supports JDBC 2.0. The methods are defined in interfaces starting with Engine (for instance, EngineStatement and EnginePreparedStatement). When the network server needs to call one of those methods, it casts the Statement object to an EngineStatement. -- Knut Anders
