[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2107?page=comments#action_12456903 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2107: ----------------------------------------------
Sorry, I was wrong on issue 2), got confused mentally walking through the code. Though the patch does remove this comment: for the situation in 2) // just deadlock out ... I think some comment should exist there indicating that the code path is not expected or maybe even throw an exception there. The patched code I think is confusing without some form of comment as to what is expected. > Move page latching out of the lock manager > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: DERBY-2107 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2107 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Store, Services, Performance > Affects Versions: 10.3.0.0 > Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen > Assigned To: Knut Anders Hatlen > Priority: Minor > Attachments: derby-2107-1a.diff, derby-2107-1a.stat > > > Latching of pages could be done more efficiently locally in store than in the > lock manager. See the discussion here: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.db.derby.devel/33135 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
