[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2060?page=comments#action_12457327 ] 
            
Bernt M. Johnsen commented on DERBY-2060:
-----------------------------------------

One minor issue: ref/rrefjavcsti.html says "Changing the current isolation for 
the connection with setTransactionIsolation commits the current transaction and 
begins a new transaction, per the JDBC standard".

The JDBC standard and JDK API spec says it's implementation defined. The JDBC 
tutorial, however,  erroneously says that the transaction commits.

> SET CURRENT ISOLATION in ref.man refers 
> java.sql.Connection.setTransactionLevel instead of 
> java.sql.Connection.setTransactionIsolation
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2060
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2060
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Bernt M. Johnsen
>         Assigned To: Kim Haase
>         Attachments: DERBY-2060-2.diff, DERBY-2060-2.zip, DERBY-2060.diff, 
> DERBY-2060.zip
>
>
> On SET CURRENT ISOLATION statement in the Derby refernce manual:
> "Issuing this command commits the current transaction, which is consistent 
> with the java.sql.Connection.setTransactionLevel method."
> The correct method name is java.sql.Connection.setTransactionIsolation 
> (java.sql.Connection.setTransactionLevel does not exist)
> BTW: setTransactionIsolation will commit the current transaction if called in 
> the client driver but not in the embedded driver. See DERBY-638

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to