[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > [Auto-generated mail] > > *tinderbox_trunk15* 489597/2006-12-22 11:12:19 CET > > Failed Tests OK Skip Duration Suite > ------------------------------------------------------- > *Jvm: 1.5* > SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386 > 26 517 491 0 118.48% derbyall > UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 0.00% > org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.suites.All > Details in > http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk15/jvm1.5/testing/Limited/testSummary-489597.html > > Attempted failure analysis in > > http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk15/jvm1.5/FailReports/489597.html > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Changes in > http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk15/UpdateInfo/489597.txt > > ( All results in http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/ )
Hmm... It seems like the Tinderbox test ran with jvm 1.6, but produced JDBC 3.0 output. Doesn't the Tinderbox test normally use jvm 1.5? I would guess it's failing because the jars were built without JDBC 4.0 support. -- Knut Anders
