I expect to have a tinderbox on 10.2.2 up and running in a short time.
Mike Matrigali wrote: > thanks, whatever you can do is appreciated. I really appreciate > the tinderbox runs especially, it gives me a quick turnaround to > check that a checkin I committed is ok. Obviously trunk is most > important for this, but I plan to continue to port appropriate bug > fixes at least to 10.2 until the next release is out. > > Henri van de Scheur - Sun Norway wrote: >> After 10.2.2.0 was released, testing on the 10.2-branch wasn't >> reactivated. As long as I have machines available, I can reactivate >> this, but I am afraid I do not have much resources to monitor this >> and/or follow up. But since you ask, I guess the need for this testing >> is apparent and I will start running these batches again and report at >> the usual place. >> >> Thanks for bringing this up! >> >> Henri >> >> Mike Matrigali wrote: >> >>> I think I checked all the links from from the derby pages: >>> http://db.apache.org/derby/derby_tests.html >>> >>> I was just looking for some head of branch (rather than the >>> official release) test results, and >>> was wondering if they are being run but pointers have not >>> been updated? >>> >>> /mikem >>> >>> >> >> > -- Ole Solberg, Database Technology Group, Sun Microsystems, Trondheim, Norway
