Oh, good, Jean. Thanks. That is the part of the issue that is a blocker,
correct?
The empty copyright string (item 1) is a nuisance but not a crime, I
believe.
I can't figure out, though, if the "copyright" and "DC.rights.owner"
meta tags in the HTML output (item 3) are merely unnecessary and
incorrect (2005!) or a serious problem.
Kim
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
I'm working on this item right now:
2) Some source files have the old style copyright in the header that is
not in compliance with http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html. For
example, see src/ref/rrefsistabssyscolperms.dita
I thought I'd give a heads up in case anyone else was about to dive in.
-jean
