[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468078
]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-2237:
-----------------------------------------
Thanks, Halley, that's what I thought. --The Derby 10.1 docs also include that
boilerplate notice, but the Copyright line itself had the additional "or its
licensors, as applicable." wording, which needed to be dropped in 10.2 for
reasons I won't go into. We'll get it untangled. I'm about to post another
comment with a suggestion for the English docs, and I suggest you hold off
doing anymore until a decision gets made.
> Cleanup copyrights in the DITA source and generated docs
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2237
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2237
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6, 10.2.2.0
> Environment: linux
> Reporter: scott hutinger
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: dita2fo-shell-copyr1.diff.gz, pt_BR_copyright.diff,
> pt_BR_copyright.diff.html, radmincopyright.html, rgscopyright.html,
> rrefcopyright.html
>
>
> Problems include:
> 1) The PDF docs currently include an empty "Copyright" string in the header.
> dita2fo-shell-copyr1.diff.gz is a patch to fix the fop (.pdf) copyright
> header which is currently blank. This is from march 9, 2006.
> 2) Some source files have the old style copyright in the header that is not
> in compliance with http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html. For example,
> see src/ref/rrefsistabssyscolperms.dita
> 3) The generated html docs have new copyright tags added, such as these
> entries in ref/crefjavbclobnot.html
> <meta name="copyright" content="(C) Copyright 2005" />
> <meta name="DC.rights.owner" content="(C) Copyright 2005" />
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
