Looking at fop, it has some different extensions in the older version
<fox:outline>, but uses something different in the newer version to
generate bookmarks etc...
So I am guessing that fop has updated some tags:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html
gives a quick overview of some of the items. I haven't looked though
all this yet....
scott
Laura Stewart wrote:
On 1/29/07, scott hutinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Laura,
No table of contents with page numbers with the new dita0T existed;
although I was also using FOP.93 which didn't create the index either
(with either DITA 1.2.x and 1.3.x). A lot of the functionality in the
derby docs are a patch to DITA in both 1.2.x versions and before. I did
use a program called meld:
http://meld.sourceforge.net/
to look at the differences between the patched 1.2.x (the patches are
replacement files in the doc trunk /lib), and wasn't certain it was
worth moving everything over).
So, to get stuff like the index, derby 1.2.x patches need to be moved
over to DITA1.3.x. Sort of a time consuming process, as a lot of the
diffs are the same (somewhat) although they might not look like it. I
think some of the DITAOTx.x.x differences are post derby changes, as I
think Jeff worked with some of the people doing the DITA work.
scott
What I did was get a copy of the documentation source before all of
the patches to DITAOT1.1.2.1 were generated (by Jeff and Andrew?) and
I used that source with DITAOT1.3 to generate the PDF output. I wanted
to see what things were fixed by the new toolkit version so that we
could eliminate any patches that are no longer necessary. I look at
the meld program as that seems like a simplier way :-)
But I was disappointed that the index did not generate since this new
version claims to have done a lot of work on the index and getting it
to appear. I have asked about this on the toolkit user list.
Is FOP .93 the latest version? I know nolthing about it ...
Can you think of anything in the fo2pdf settings that would turn off
the index generation?
