[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469012
]
Dyre Tjeldvoll commented on DERBY-2191:
---------------------------------------
I think a single method makes a lot of sense, and I would seriously consider it
if it wasn't for the large number of files that would have to be changed.
(Which is also why I didn't rename anySetBit() to something more meaningful.
e.g. firstSetBit()).
> Cleanup of FormatableBitSet
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2191
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2191
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Miscellaneous
> Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6
> Reporter: Dyre Tjeldvoll
> Assigned To: Dyre Tjeldvoll
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 10.3.0.0
>
> Attachments: anysetbit.v1.diff, anysetbit.v1.stat, anysetbit.v2.diff,
> bitops.v1.diff, bitops.v1.stat, bitops.v2.diff, bitops.v2.stat,
> bitops.v3.diff, bitopt.v1.diff, bitopt.v1.stat, bitopt.v2.diff,
> boundarycheck.v1.diff, boundarycheck.v1.stat, cleanup2191.diff,
> cleanup2191.stat, deadcode.v1.diff, deadcode.v2.diff, fbstst.v1.diff,
> fbstst.v1.stat, FormatableBitSetTest.java, numbitsset.v1.diff,
> numbitsset.v1.stat, numbitsset.v2.diff, numbitstest.diff, shrink.v1.diff,
> shrink.v1.stat, unusedmethods.v1.diff, unusedmethods.v1.stat,
> valuenotnull.v1.diff, valuenotnull.v1.stat
>
>
> The implementation of FormatableBitSet could be streamlined. Dead code can be
> removed and the implementation of some methods can be simplified.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
