Laura Stewart wrote:
On 2/2/07, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
scott hutinger wrote:
...
> I think the important thing, is to move over to fop.93 if possible. I
> started, but didn't know enough about the structure needed (although
> it's fairly simple), and got sidetracked. The updates to indexing etc
> in DITA are not related to standard fo xslt, as I looked at the
plugin.
> I think the current indexing is fine isn't it? I can't remember
much of
> what Jeff said needed fixed.
>
> scott
Neither one of these fix that problem. The fix is due to the dita
files in the derby docs /lib directory. These files currently replace
some of the DITA_OT files, so indexing and other items (I don't know
what all it fixes for the derby docs).
To move up to fop.93, the files in the /lib directory need to be
updated to work.
To move up to DITA1.3.1, the /lib directory in the derby docs should be
updated to the 1.3.1 code base of DITA. Which means looking at the
diffs between the current DITA version used currently, and 1.3.1. I
don't think much has happened in the FOP portion though. One could just
move up to DITA1.3.1, and replace the files with the current derby
files, and it might work. Although I can't remember if I tried that.
But they should really be updated to the 1.3.1 base, although I am not
certain what would be gained. I'm certain something would be gained.
Does anything exist in the current index that isn't working? I know
Jeff had a list of items, but don't know if he was having any problems
with indexing?
scott
The indexes are in place in the DITA source files. However, the index
it's self is not being generated. I am hoping that either FOP .93 or
te 1.3 toolkit will fix that problem :-)
