[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12477042
 ] 

Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-2387:
--------------------------------------

The system procedures could be ordered alphabetically but I think that there 
are specific logical groups of procedures that should be ordered together.  For 
example, EXPORT and IMPORT should be listed together instead of strictly 
alphabetically. 

I'd appreciate hearing if anyone feels that alphabetical order is better...

Here is the order that I propose for the system procedures:

SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_BACKUP_DATABASE
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_BACKUP_DATABASE_NOWAIT
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_BACKUP_DATABASE_AND_ENABLE_LOG_ARCHIVE_MODE
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_BACKUP_DATABASE_AND_ENABLE_LOG_ARCHIVE_MODE_NOWAIT
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_CHECKPOINT_DATABASE
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_COMPRESS_TABLE
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_INPLACE_COMPRESS_TABLE
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_DISABLE_LOG_ARCHIVE_MODE
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_EXPORT_TABLE
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_EXPORT_QUERY
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_IMPORT_DATA
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_IMPORT_TABLE
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_FREEZE_DATABASE
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_UNFREEZE_DATABASE
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_SET_DATABASE_PROPERTY
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_SET_RUNTIMESTATISTICS
SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_SET_STATISTICS_TIMING


> DOCs - Reorder the topics in the Ref Manual into Alphabetical order - 
> functions, procedures, and JDBC reference
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2387
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2387
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Laura Stewart
>         Assigned To: Laura Stewart
>            Priority: Minor
>
> 1) The SUM and TAN functions need to be switched for alphabetical order. 
> 2) The system functions and procedures are not in alphabetical order. Is 
> there some reason why not? 
> 3) The JDBC reference section isn't in alphabetical order either. It might 
> make sense to reorder it to correspond with the javadoc (which separates 
> interfaces, classes, and exceptions into subgroups and orders them 
> alphabetically). I'd also suggest putting java.sql.Driver.getPropertyInfo in 
> a subtopic under java.sql.Driver. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to