Okay, is it acceptable in places where we are only discussing the procedure to omit the SYSCS_UTIL. portion of the name? Clearly in examples that users might copy/paste we would use the full name.
On 3/2/07, Suresh Thalamati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Laura Stewart wrote: > Is it possible to change the name of a built-in system procedure? > The following procedures cause real problems in the PDF output of the > docs because of their really long names: > SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_BACKUP_DATABASE_AND_ENABLE_LOG_ARCHIVE_MODE > SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_BACKUP_DATABASE_AND_ENABLE_LOG_ARCHIVE_MODE_NOWAIT > > Is it possible to shorten the names of these built-in system procedures? > No. First procedure been there from 10.0 and the second one was added in the last 10.2 release. Changing names can break an existing application that depend on them, so not a good to change them. Thanks -suresh
-- Laura Stewart
